The Verge, citing New York Times reporting, described New Matrix as approved to buy advanced AI accelerators even though reporters found an apparently empty listed office and corporate links that raised questions about its independence.

The episode does not by itself prove unlawful diversion. It does show the difficulty of validating beneficial ownership, physical operations and end use when licensing decisions rely on company filings and applicant disclosures.

Go to the source

This is an original summary, not a republication of the full report.

Read the original at The Verge ↗